Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

When you're a teenage girl, you look at Tiger Beat or Seventeen, filled with pics of young teen hunks. Then, as you get older, all the magazines for older women are about hair, makeup, and clothes. Men have Playboy, Maxim, FHM, etc. Where are the pictures with the Yankees with their shirts off? Or the men from Lost on the hot sweaty beach? Why isn't the new Bond plastered half naked across every magazine like Paris Hilton is? There must be more women like me who just want to see some sexy men! Who's with me ladies?



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

Try Playgirl



Anyway, I think there aren't more adult mags for women is because we're stereotyped as not buying things of that nature, so it wouldn't be a successful for magazine companies to incorporate these types of adult magazines to their collection.



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

The market for those sort of magazines has proven to be poor. Maybe women were embarrassed to buy them.



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

You go girl!!!!



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

Unfortunately, men have a stereotypically higher sex drive. It must suck for you ladies :P



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

Typically men are visual and women are verbal this is why there aren't more because the demand isn't high, not to mention that a lot of men really are pervs. (not trying to offend anyone, honestly). But in any case have you tried Cosmo. ?



Why aren't there more adult magazines with men as eye candy?

We aren't as visual as men are, I would guess. I prefer flesh-and-blood men, and the things that give them dimension, not just their looks.

No comments:

Post a Comment